For meta-aggregators & bridges

Your users see your number. Your number came from your providers.

A meta-aggregator’s own quote honesty is inherited from whichever providers it routes through. That’s not a criticism of any specific platform — it’s a structural fact about how routing works: your output is a function of your inputs.

Provider inheritance, measured

Enso’s independent benchmark grades providers on exactly this: some sit in Tier 1 (under 5% overquote), some sit in Tier 3, where “inflation is essentially universal.” [Independent — Enso, Apr 2026] Nordstern is Tier 1. Adding a Tier 1 provider to a routing set that includes lower-tier providers can move the accuracy of the top quote your algorithm selects in one direction: up, never down.

This isn’t an argument against any provider you already use — multi-homing across providers of different strengths is exactly how sophisticated routing sets are built. It’s an argument for including one more high-integrity source in the comparison, particularly for the long-tail tokens and chains where the gap between providers is largest. See Coverage for what “long tail” means here.

We’re already queried by 1delta, Enso, LI.FI, Matcha Meta, Mayan and deBridge, and listed as one of Oku’s 14 swap routers. [Partner-observable — Oku docs; Matcha Meta announced publicly; rest company-stated. Enso also runs the benchmark cited above — separate roles, disclosed] Adding us as an additional source is a config change, not an integration project.

Verify any transaction before you send it

A dedicated simulation endpoint (POST /simulate/{chain_id}) verifies any swap transaction against live chain state — the same machinery behind every Nordstern quote. [Own claim — docs]